TakeAction: Herbicide Resistance Management
Update on Herbicide Resistant Weeds in Wisconsin
The Weed Science Society of America recently held an Herbicide Resistance Summit that brought together leading weed scientists from around the world to discuss the future of herbicide resistance at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington D.C. All of the presentations are on YouTube.
If you have 1 minute or 30 minutes, take the time to hear what the Director of the Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, Stephen Powles, says about herbicide resistance in the United States.
Diversify Weed Management
The Transgenic Treadmill
Avoiding the Herbicide Resistance Train Wreck in the United States
Harvest Weed Seed Control
Don’t miss this year’s “Pest Management in Wisconsin Field Crops” from University of Wisconsin Extension. This is a comprehensive guide to insect, weed, and plant disease management in corn, soybean, forage, and stored grain crops.
To obtain a print copy of the guide, go here. For a free electronic copy in pdf format, go here for the download. For mobile access, go to University of Wisconsin Extension’s Pest Management Mobile.
The 2015 Wisconsin Crop Management conference will be held at the Alliant Energy Center in Madison, Wisconsin from January 13 until January 15. To save on advance registration, make sure to submit your form and payment by December 19, 2014.
Vince Davis, Thomas Butts, and Dan Smith will be presenting at this year’s conference. During the Weed Management section on Wednesday January 14, Vince will be talking about “Efficacy of “new” herbicides and program approaches for resistance management.” Tommy will be discussing his latest research results, “Herbicide-resistant pigweeds (Amaranthus spp.) are in Wisconsin, how serious is it?” Dan will be presenting his research on “Cover crop establishment following commonly applied corn and soybean herbicides in Wisconsin.”
Yep, it is that time of year. Winter is setting in and the 2014 WCWS Research Report is here to chase away the winter blues. Print copies will be distributed at the Pest Management Update meetings and at the Wisconsin Crop Management conference. Check out our Documents page again in December for an updated report with yield data.
A critical component of herbicide resistance management and integrated pest management is scouting for pests. In this case, it is time to start thinking about scouting for late-season weed escapes. Late-season weed scouting will help to focus your weed management plans for next year- what worked, did not work, and which weed species may be a problem during the next growing season. If you suspect that you have found an herbicide-resistant weed, please contact your local county Extension agent or Vince Davis at firstname.lastname@example.org
To learn more about late-season weed scouting in soybean, please watch Vince’s videos:
For more videos, please visit our video page, http://wcws.cals.wisc.edu/videos/
Thomas R. Butts and Vince M. Davis
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) is a dioecious, small seeded, broadleaf weed species native to North America, specifically common in the Midwest region of the United States. This weed species has become increasingly problematic for corn and soybean growers due to its prolific growth characteristics and highly competitive ability. Among its fellow pigweed (Amaranthaceae) family members, common waterhemp is second only to Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in growth rate and size reaching heights of nearly ten feet 4. Furthermore, common waterhemp can produce over one million seeds per female plant under ideal growing conditions 8. This intensifies the likelihood and speed that herbicide-resistant biotypes can increase in a population and transfer from one location to another through seed dispersal. If common waterhemp is left unmanaged in corn and soybean, growers can see yield reductions of 74 and 56%, respectively2,7.
Control of common waterhemp has become increasingly difficult due to its ability of evolving resistance to numerous herbicide sites-of-action. To date, this weed species has been identified as resistant to six different sites-of-action, including an ALS-resistant biotype located in Wisconsin. Several common waterhemp populations have also evolved resistance to multiple herbicide sites-of-action, further complicating control methods1,5. Glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp biotypes have already been confirmed in fifteen other states including nearby Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Minnesota3. Our current research reported here suggests we will add Wisconsin to this list as data from our first greenhouse experiment indicates at least two Wisconsin common waterhemp populations are resistant to glyphosate out of 14 populations examined.
The two weed populations examined were collected from crop production fields in Eau Claire and Pierce counties. They were identified through the Late-Season Weed Escape Survey in Wisconsin Corn and Soybean Fields conducted in 2012 and 2013 by former graduate research assistant, Ross A. Recker. Plants that were collected in the field were likely to have survived a postemergence glyphosate application based on in-field observations of herbicide symptomology, plant locations, personal communication with growers, and other additional data documented during the survey. To confirm glyphosate resistance, seed was collected from 30 mature plants in the field, progeny were grown in the UW-Madison greenhouse, and 10 plants per glyphosate rate were sprayed with Roundup PowerMAX® plus ammonium sulfate at 17 lbs. per 100 gallons of spray solution when they reached three inches tall. Glyphosate rates used were 0, 0.22 (5.5), 0.43 (11), 0.87 (22), 1.74 (44), and 3.48 (88) kg ae ha-1 (fl. oz. ac-1). Plant dry biomass data were collected 28 days after application (DAA). Comparisons between our putative resistant and susceptible biotypes were determined by the effective glyphosate dose needed to reduce plant dry biomass 50% (ED50).
The ten Pierce County plants sprayed at the 0.87 kg ae ha-1 (22 fl. oz. ac-1) rate all survived and grew to an average of three times their spray date height (Figure 1). At the 1.74 kg ae ha-1 (44 fl. oz. ac-1) rate, nine of ten plants survived and grew to an average of two times their spray date height (Figure 2). The ED50 of glyphosate for the Pierce County and susceptible populations was 2.23 and 0.18 kg ae ha-1, respectively (Figure 3). This indicates the Pierce County population has a 12.5-fold level of resistance.
The ten Eau Claire County plants sprayed at the 0.87 kg ae ha-1 (22 fl. oz. ac-1) rate all survived and grew to an average of five times greater than their spray date height (Figure 4). All ten plants also survived the 1.74 kg ae ha-1 (44 fl. oz. ac-1) rate and quadrupled in size from their spray date height (Figure 5). The Eau Claire County population was not able to be analyzed using the log logistic Dose Response Model in R due to inadequate high rates of glyphosate to reduce dry biomass at 28 DAA. Therefore, linear glyphosate response models were established for the Eau Claire County and susceptible populations and analyzed using ANOVA tables which indicated significant differences at all glyphosate rates (Figure 6) (Table 1).
There are several key components to an effective control strategy for glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp. The use of alternative herbicide sites-of-action, such as PPO inhibitors, and tank-mixing multiple herbicide sites-of-action will improve glyphosate-resistant weed control. An early planting date will allow crops to gain a head-start and outcompete common waterhemp due to its late emergence timing6. Herbicide applications should be made at the correct timing when weeds are small and actively growing to ensure the greatest efficacy of the herbicide based on label recommendations. Furthermore, special care should be taken to clean tillage and harvest equipment thoroughly as they can quickly spread weed seed among fields. The focus of these best management practices is to diversify weed control measures, reduce weed seed additions to the soil seedbank, and utilize control measures in the most effective method possible.
This research experiment will be repeated to officially confirm glyphosate resistance in these common waterhemp populations. For updates on Wisconsin weeds please visit our Wisconsin Crop Weed Science website at http://wcws.cals.wisc.edu/. Further information on controlling common waterhemp or other glyphosate-resistant weeds can be found at: http://takeactiononweeds.com/. Finally, if you believe you may be facing glyphosate-resistant weeds in your fields, contact your local county extension agent and/or Dr. Vince Davis at email@example.com or (608) 262-1392.
Ross Recker (Graduate Research Assistant), John Buol (Undergraduate Research Assistant), and Vince Davis (Assistant Professor) Department of Agronomy, UW-Madison
Glyphosate-resistant weeds continue to be a major threat to corn and soybean production across the Nation. A pro-active survey of late-season weed escapes in corn and soybean fields was conducted throughout Wisconsin in 2012 and 2013. One objective of the survey was to identify areas where populations of glyphosate-resistant weeds may exist.
In 2012, a population of horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) collected from Jefferson County, and glyphosate screening in the greenhouse confirmed it was glyphosate-resistant with a 6-fold tolerance compared to a susceptible population. This announcement and more information about horseweed biology and management were previously reported and can be read here.
During the 2013 late-season survey, another putative glyphosate-resistant horseweed population was collected from Columbia County. Again whole-plant dose response experiments were recently conducted in the greenhouse and results confirm this population is also nearly six-fold glyphosate-resistant (Figure 1).
The horseweed seeds were collected from mature plants in a soybean field with a history of no-till, corn/soybean rotation, and glyphosate use. These plants displayed symptomology at the time of collection including shortened internodes (Figure 2) and were scattered randomly at low densities in about a 2 to 3 acre patch. If you have horseweed or other weeds that survive postemergence applications, you should have concern about herbicide resistance. Contact your local county Ag Extension Agent who can help you further evaluate the situation and plan a pro-active resistant management program so you can take action against herbicide resistance.
Under Cover Farmers is a video featuring farmers discussing how they use cover crops and specifically rolling-crimping for termination in a conventional system. The video is 28 minutes in length and was produced by the USDA-NRCS.
It’s worth taking a long coffee break and hearing what these farmers have to say.
Don’t miss this year’s Pest Management in Wisconsin Field Crops guide from University of Wisconsin Extension.
New updates to the weed managment section include: